Regarding window glass removal during victim extrication, which combination of statements is correct?

Regarding window glass removal during victim extrication, which combination of statements is correct?

• A. Statement 1 and 2 are true, statement 3 is false.
• B. Statement 1 is true, statements 2 and 3 are true.
• C. Statement 1 is false, statements 2 and 3 are true.
• D. All three statements are true.

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is making safe, purposeful decisions about removing window glass during a victim extrication. Glass removal should only be used when it helps you reach and treat the patient or remove them from the vehicle, and it must be done with control—using the right tools, protecting the patient from shards, and preserving spinal and overall scene safety. Two of the statements align with that careful approach: glass removal can be used to gain necessary access and to facilitate patient care, and it should be performed with controlled technique and after stabilizing the scene or the patient to minimize additional injury. The third statement likely asks you to remove glass in a way or to a degree that would unnecessarily increase risk or fail to consider stabilization and safety, which makes it false. If you share the exact text of the three statements, I can map them precisely to why two are true and one is not.

The main idea here is making safe, purposeful decisions about removing window glass during a victim extrication. Glass removal should only be used when it helps you reach and treat the patient or remove them from the vehicle, and it must be done with control—using the right tools, protecting the patient from shards, and preserving spinal and overall scene safety.

Two of the statements align with that careful approach: glass removal can be used to gain necessary access and to facilitate patient care, and it should be performed with controlled technique and after stabilizing the scene or the patient to minimize additional injury. The third statement likely asks you to remove glass in a way or to a degree that would unnecessarily increase risk or fail to consider stabilization and safety, which makes it false.

If you share the exact text of the three statements, I can map them precisely to why two are true and one is not.